|
Murdoch's Little "Steam Devils"
Model No1 - 1781-84
(Piston Diameter-3/4", Stroke-2 & 3/16th")
The earliest reference we have of William Murdoch's model steam carraiges
comes in the correspondence between James Watt, Thomas Wilson (Watt's agent
in Cornwall), and Mathew Boulton, (senior partner in the firm of Boulton
& Watt - Murdoch's employers).
DOCUMENTED EVIDENCE :
1784,
March 7th - Thomas Wilson, Watt's agent in Cornwall, in a letter
to James Watt
The Earliest mention of Murdoch's model steam-chariots :
"He (William Murdoch) has an amazing genius and I am almost afraid
will lead him too far, he has mentioned to me a new scheme which you may
be assured he is very intent upon, but which he is afraid of mentioning
to you for fear of your laughing at him, it is no less than drawing carraiges
upon the road with steam engines, for my part I think there is too many
difficulties ever to answer, or going up and down hills, and I c I do not
mention this from him, viz by his desire, but as it has taken such hold
of him, I think it is right that you should be acquainted with it, and
either consult with him, on the means he proposes to make it answer if
you think it practicle, or endeavour to convince him of it's impossibility,
he says that what he proposes, is different from anything you ever thought
of, and that he is positively certain of it's answering and that there
is a great deal of money to be made by it, I shall inform him that I have
wrote to you on the subject, which I have a notion is what he wishes but
did not know how to do it himself"
1784, April
10th - James Watt, in reply to Thomas Wilson
"In relation to Wheel carraiges, I do not consider that
there (will) be much difficulty in moving them by steam, but that the (amount)
of Boiler fuel and water necessary would make a very considerable weight,
which at present I see no way of lessening - I should in (any) case use
no condenser yet the water necessary for a machine which exacted the power
of one horse would be two cubic feet for (each) hour and as water is not
everywhere to be got, at least not without the inconvience of stopping,
provision should be laid in for 4 hours besides the quantity always necessary
contained within the Boiler. So that supposing the vehicle to be a post
chaise with two persons their common luggage and driver I compute that
the weight would be at least three thousand pounds. In other respects I
esteem that thing certainly possible and practical, whether profitable
or not I am doubtful considering the great expense attending the (setting)
new schemes a going and the (rubbs) which attend them. Mr Boulton will
converse with William about it when he comes down to Cornwall, till then
it had better sleep."
1784, April
19th - Thomas Wilson, replying in a letter to James Watt
"Wm has your letter respecting the Carraiges, but has he
did not read it, then, I have not seen him since have not heard what he
thinks of your objections, which with me has great weight, however, when
Mr Boulton comes they will talk over this and I hope he will be induced
to drop the sanguine opinion of it, he has held for I cannot think it will
answer the expectations he had formed, and if pursued would take him from
his present business, which can ill spare him."
1784, May
15th - Thomas Wilson, in a letter to James Watt
"I hope Mr Boulton will not be long before he arrives, as
he begins to be really wanted and principally on William Murdoch's account
who is discontented and chiefly owing to the carraige scheme, in which
I believe he must be humoured, as he seems bent upon it, it will be best
to take no notice of it tho till Mr Boulton comes as he (Wm) is remarkably
captious, and requires to be delicately treated, however I do not doubt
but he will be managed, (we must not lose him), but I am sorry to find
it requires more than I expected."
1784 -
May 25th - James Watt, replying to Thomas Wilson
"I am yours of y 15th, and am more sorry to hear what you
tell me of W.M. .... I am sorry I wrote anything to you on the subject
of the carraiges but I mentioned only a small part of the arguments which
have hitherto deterred me from meddling with them, anything we can do in
reason to bring his mind to a proper bias you may readily suppose we will
do."
1784 -
June 12th - Thomas Wilson, writing to James Watt
"William seems more contented lately, and I hope when Mr
Boulton arrives he will be set right, but he is still bent upon his carraige
scheme, which I wish had never entered his brains"
1784 -
July 22nd - Mathew Boulton, senior partner, writing to James Watt
"I shall do all I can to make a pleasant Murdoch but I fear
it is not of my power to do what you wish. I have talked to him a little
about Chariots which I find is a family madness. His father and him were
about one with a corn engine some years ago. He seems fearful lest somebody
else should go upon the same scheme."
"I fear he will not hire or agree term of years upon any term unless
we could accomplish it by a side wind. If we could enter into an agreement
with him to make or try to make wheel carraiges in partnership for a term
of years but at the same time oblige him to do our Cornish business and
no other except wheel carraiges. .........I know no way of bribing him
so effectively as to talk to him about his hobby horse......"
1784 -
August 6th - Mathew Boulton, writing to James Watt
"I have had a little conversation with Murdoch about Wheel
cargs. He proposes to catch most of the condensed Steam by making it strike
against broad Copper plates and the condensed part trickling down may be
caught in a reservoir. This may do some good in rain or frosty weather
& he proposes to have different sized revolvers to apply at every hill
& vale according to their angle with ye horizon. What he wishes to
do may be right by ye means he proposes will not do. I find his Father
hath a W1 Carraige to go without horses which I believe Logan Malcomb lately
saw in Scotland as this was one of the first mechanical amusement wch Murdoch
ever turned his attention to in his youth it serves to account for his
furur he is seized with : I verily believe he would sooner give up all
his Cornish business & interests than be deprived of carrying the thing
into execution. When a Man is mad in any way it is vain to reason with
him about his disorder."
"He doth not directly say he hath a right to work pistons by Steam
but he says he thinks or fears that the Trumpeters or somebody else will
then take out a patent for W1 Carrgs wch is the thing he says that makes
him so sollicitous to have secured. Now as you are going to specify sundry
new applications of Steam Engines Qy if it may be prudent to specify the
application of it to W1 Carggs without making any drawing. I propose this
by way of taking posssession & saveing the expense of a patent."
"I believe a Steam Engine carg may be made lighter than a common
post Chaise if you include the weight of the horses for in going up hill
animal power must be furnished by them to raise the weight of their own
bodies wch I consider only as other kinds of Steam Engines. I think a very
light and cheap modell might be made takeing one of our drawn tubes of
an Inch diamr to make the Cylinder of."
"I am sensible 'tis wrong to crowd you with new schemes at this time
but my only reasons were the two following viz - 1st to seize the present
moment of putting it into our specification & 2nd to ask you whether
I shall make any agreement with Murdoch or not to acquiesse in any thing
wch tends to keep peace & that doth not interrupt or retard our present
real business. "
1784 -
August 7th - Thomas Wilson, writing to James Watt
"You will please come to some determination as soon as possible
about Wm, he seems to be a little more reconciled to his situation than
before, but far from being easy, and before Mr Boulton leaves us, he ought
to come to some eclairissment with him, to enable him to do which, I would
recommend you to state to Mr Boulton your sentiments fully on the Carraige
Scheme and what part you would be willing for Wm to take in it, without
this I am fully persuaded after Mr Boulton leaves us, that Wm will be more
uneasy both to himself and others than he already has been."
1784 -
August 17th - James Watt writing to Mathew Boulton
"I have given such descriptions of engines for wheel carraiges
as I could in the time and space I could allow myself; but it is very defective
and can only serve to keep other people from similar patents."
1784 -
August 19th - Mathew Boulton writing to James Watt
"I think Murdoch is getting better into tune but I must
say something more to him before I leave upon Carraige subject or he will
relapse. We must make the best of mankind as we find them."
1784 -
August 27th - James Watt writing to Mathew Boulton
Extracts from the copy of patent No 1432 filed 28th August
1784; and enrolled 24 August 1784 - Seventh Improvement :
Watt skips through boiler design in a couple of lines, as he clearly
has no intention of using strong steam except occassionally
He then states "as usual in other steam engines I employ the elastic
force of steam to give motion to the pistons and after it has performed
it's office,
I discharge it into the atmosphere by a proper regulating valve"
or
"I discharge it into a condensing vessel made airtight and formed
of thin plates or pipes of metal having their outsides exposed to the wind
or to an artificial current of air."
Authors note : The first alternative repeats the fourth article of the
original 1769 patent, the second alternative, of surface cooling, is William's
idea as described in the letter between Boulton & Watt of August 6th.
Watt then describes a rather complicated system of gears for transmitting
the rotative motion from the engine to the drive axle of the carraige.
He postulates a two person chaise requiring an engine with a cylinder seven
inches in diameter and going at sixty strokes a minute with a double acting
engine, and there the patent rests.
Letter entilted "Some of my idea's on the wheel carraige scheme".
Briefly, Watt deals with the idea of saving water by recondensing it,
and of the gears, which he pen sketches, before embarking on the total
weight to be moved. He then goes further into the power to weight ratio
problem and the need for smooth road surfaces, before concluding that the
existing design would only produce a speed of one and half miles an hour.
He suggests that 4mph is what is required and poses a number of questions
which must be answered to determine the probability of success or failure.
The second, ways of reducing the size and weight of the boiler and water,
he answers positively (incorporating Murdoch's surface cooling idea).
Watt then states "Thirdly, whether it will require steam of more
than one and a half atmospheric density to exert power equal to six pounds
on the inch, (otherwise a longer, heavier cylinder will be required
or the engine will have to work at more than sixty strokes a minute which
he thinks impracticle), "principally because the rotative motion already
turns too fast for the axle of the chaise".
He then recites a number of other problems which he thinks can probably
be overcome - gears, brakes, soot and smoke, and the shaking of the coach
causing both greater fuel consumption and greater stress on the engine
parts "but perhaps some remedy may be devised for this in constuction"
Watt continues in his letter to Boulton :
"From what I have said, and from much more which a little reflection
will suggest to you, you will see that without several circumstances turn
out more favourable than has been stated, the machine will be clumsy and
defective, and that it will cost much time to bring it to any tolerable
degree of perfection, and that for me to interrupt the career of our business
to bestow my attention on it would be imprudent. I even grudge the time
I have taken to write these comments on it."
"I now come to the most difficult part of this subject which is the
proper conduct to be observed with regard to Murdoch. I fear that if we
enter into the scheme with him that it will take up his whole attention,
to the neglect of more material business both to himself and us and that
in case of not immediately succeeding, which is to be expected, you will
be led from one experiment to another hoping for an amendment, and then
it may succeed only ambiguously which is the most dangerous.... if he succeeds
tolerably he will naturally attach himself totally to it and we shall lose
the benefit of his knowledge and experience in our Cornish business (unless
the result of the experiments prove flat denial to the scheme.)
"I shall prove no obstacle to that scheme my only reasons against
it were that I feared it would deprive us of a valuable man, and it would
if we were to be concerned in it divert us from more valuable business
and perhaps prove to be a sinking fund and lastly that I did not like that
a scheme which I had revolved (sic) in my mind for years and hoped should
be able at some favoutable time to bring perfection if capable of it, should
be rested from me or that I should be compelled to go into it as a secondary
person. But now I have had the latter objection give way. And as to the
first I think it will take place at any rate so we must make the best of
it. Nevertheless let us proceed with caution..."
"I will reduce what I have to say into two propositions which are
the only ones I can think of making."
"The first is that the whole concern shall be carried on with our
money and that he shall have a certain share of the profits after deduction
of interest, say the fourth or less if less will satisfy him for superintending
the business, and We bind ourselves to lay out £100 on experiments
solely under his direction, (for I assure you I will not meddle with it
in any degree), and bargain to be for a term, ten or more years, provided
the business be carried on and also provided that the agreement shall be
null and void in so far as respects us, unless he shall within one year
make a machine or engine which will drive or move a post chaise, carrying
two ordinary persons and a driver with two hundred pounds of luggage besides
the engine the boiler and stocks of fuel for four hours and of water for
two hours moving at the rate of four miles per hour on the average on a
common Cornish Turnpike road and at the same time the machine to be manageable
by a man of ordinary capacity. And also that he shall not neglect the business
entrusted by us to his care in Cornwall or unreasonably absent hmself from
the same without our leave."
"The second proposition is for us to resign the whole machine entirely
to him, on condition of his paying us a certain yearly premium on each
machine proportionate to the number of horses such machine has ordinarily
been drawn by..... and bind ourselves to grant such licence to him only
provided he brings the machine to success in three years, and supplies
the demand which may thus arise so as not to bring us into any scrape with
the public, but I believe this part of the bargain must not be expressed
in any legal document lest it militate against. I have done nothing in
my last patent on that head but collect inventions which were secured to
me before and I am sorry I have included the article (on steam carraiges)
lest he should think I did it in opposition to him whereas I put it in
to stop the gap against wolves and wasps and other venemous creatures.
This last proposition meets my ideas the most fully as I do not wish to
be diverted from our business and I do not chuse to risk money at the directions
of a man over whom I may not have a proper control and in a scheme I do
not entirely approve of..."
"If the first proposition is gone upon I would not choose to have
anything to do with it if he has more than one quarter profits but in such
case would refer the premiums for machines to you."
"The thing I mean to inculcate strongly in this letter are :
Firstly, to attempt to dissuade him from the scheme on prudential
motives without saying the thing will not do, because that may not be the
truth and may militate against us in the bargain for permission."
"Secondly, if that cannot be done, to sacrifce such a sum as a hundred
pounds on experiments rather than lose a valuable man and I would consent
to swim in the case of our being to have a premium only."
"Thirdly, in no case to make him a partner, only to give him a share
of the profits."
"Fourthly, to limit the sum to be spent on experiments and the time
allotted for it in which time if he does not accomplish it we are to be
free from bargain."
"Fifthly, to determine accurately what the machine is to do it's
properties to be such as would make it useful."
"Sixthly, to make it the means of tying Murdoch to the business if
it does not succeed."
"Seventhly, in the latter case to fix his wages and emoluments clearly
and distinctly but nb the man must always be our servant and not his...
as he has been a very usefull servant to us, though his conduct lately
has been very disagreeable I think we ought not to impose too harsh terms
upon him, nor any futher prevent him from going on with his scheme, and
if he will leave us, to part with him on the most friendly terms, and if
he rather chooses it, to give him the premium on the first six engines
in a present rather than give the hundred pounds, or if you think it necessary,
to give him both the one and the other. And this to be considered more
in the light of a reward for past services, than any hope of them in the
future....."
"You have now my full opinion on the subject which use as you please
but I beg this letter may be kept secret even from you own family, such
things should not in fact be trusted to writing."
Watt's "pre-emptive" steam carraige
The letter was accompanied by a rough sketch of Watts "pre-emptive"
steam carraige, a crude, unformed and impractical sketch in comparison
to the working model, which Murdoch had by this time built and tested without
Watts knowledge.
1815 -
May - Murdoch's son John, writing to James Watt Jr
A postscript to the letter, added by James Watt Jr, in reference
reads :
"...that this must be a mistake as Mr R. Boulton (Mathew's son) said
he saw it work in 1784."
1839 -
Historical Eloge by M.Arago
M.Arago published an historical eloge of Watt translated by
Watt's biographer Muirhead. In referring to Murdoch, Arago also refers
to a friend who "saw the model steam carraige run round Murdoch's living
room in Redruth in 1784".
1850 -
October - Buckle, presenting a Paper to the Institute of Mechanical Engineers
"At the time Mr Murdoch was making his experiments with
his Locomotive Engine, he greatly alarmed the clergyman of the Parish of
Redruth. One night, after returning from his duties at the mine, he wished
to put to test the power of his engine, and as railroads were then unknown,
he had recourse to the walk leading to the church situated about a mile
from the town. This was rather narrow, but kept rolled like a garden walk,
and bounded on each side by high hedges. The night was dark, and he alone
sallied out with his engine, lighted the fire or lamp under the boiler,
and started the Locomotive with the Inventor in full chase after it. Shortly
after he heard a distant despair - like shouting; it was too dark to perceive
objects, but he soon found that the cries for assistance proceeded from
the worthy pastor, who, going into the town on business, was met on the
lonely road by the fiery monster, who he subsequently declared he took
to be the Evil One in persona. Whoever has been on one of our modern railroads
on a dark night, and seen an apporaoching train - now no novelty - may
easily imagine what effect the awful sight would have on the nerves of
an elderly gentleman of the last century; and although the Demon was of
small dimensions, yet it was a total stranger and quite unlooked for, in
such a locality."
AUTHORS COMMENT :
In all the correspondence between Watt, Boulton and Wilson, there is
no specific mention of the existence of a model locomotive. Nor is there
any surviving correspondence from Murdoch to the three previously mentioned
correspondents, therefore we can only guess as to Williams response to
the "offer" Watt outlines to his senior partner, Mathew Boulton. Williams'
opinion on steam-carraige matters, if recorded in any correspondence, does
not survive.
The model in the science museum is Model No1 (the only survivor), built
by trial and error between 1781 & 1784 and although unseen by Watt,
Boulton & Wilson, it was seen by others to whom Murdoch had demonstrated
it to at his home in Redruth, Cornwall & witnessed by R.Boulton Jr,
M.Arago, the elderly Parson and his daughter.
BACK
|